🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.